Documentation

Use alert topics

Kapacitor’s alert system allows a publish-and-subscribe design pattern to be used. Alerts are published to a topic and handlers subscribe to it.

This example will walk the reader through setting up a simple cpu threshold alert that sends alerts to Slack.

Requirements

It is expected that the reader is already familiar the basics of Kapacitor presented in the Getting Started guide. The reader should also have a basic understanding of working with tasks and TICKscripts.

It is further expected that a working Telegraf and Kapacitor are installed to walk through this example. If these are not installed, please take a second to set up both of them.

The task

This walk-through is going to demonstrate how to set up a cpu alert topic and send alerts to that topic.

First define a simple cpu alert.

dbrp "telegraf"."autogen"

stream
    |from()
        .measurement('cpu')
        .groupBy(*)
    |alert()
        .warn(lambda: "usage_idle" < 20)
        .crit(lambda: "usage_idle" < 10)
        // Send alerts to the `cpu` topic
        .topic('cpu')

The above TICKscript creates a threshold alert for CPU usage and sends the alerts to the cpu topic.

Save the above script as cpu_alert.tick. Create and start the task by running the following commands:

$ kapacitor define cpu_alert -tick cpu_alert.tick
$ kapacitor enable cpu_alert

The Slack handler

At this point a Kapacitor task which is generating alerts and sending them to the cpu topic, but since the topic does not have any handlers nothing happens with the alerts.

Confirm that there are no handlers by checking the topic:

$ kapacitor show-topic cpu

The output should look something like:

ID: cpu
Level: OK
Collected: 27
Handlers: []
Events:
Event                            Level    Message                                Date
cpu:cpu=cpu3,host=localhost      OK       cpu:cpu=cpu3,host=localhost is OK      23 Jan 17 14:04 MST

If the error message unknown topic: "cpu" is returned, please be aware, that topics are created only when needed, as such if the task has not triggered an alert yet, the topic will not exist. If this error about the topic not existing is returned, then, try and cause an alert to be triggered. Either change the thresholds on the task or create some cpu load.

To configure a handler first the handler binding must be defined. A handler binding has a few parts:

  • Topic - The topic ID.
  • ID - The unique ID of the handler.
  • Kind - The kind of handler, in this case it will be a slack handler
  • Match - A lambda expression to filter matching alerts. By default all alerts match.
  • Options - A map of values, differs by kind.

The slack handler binding can be defined in either yaml or json, here yaml is used:

topic: cpu
id: slack
kind: slack
options:
  channel: '#alerts'

The above handler binding definition defines a handler that sends alerts to the slack channel #alerts.

Save the above text as slack.yaml. Now the new handler can be bound to the topic via the kapacitor client. To do this the define-topic-handler command is used. It takes one argument.

$ kapacitor define-topic-handler
Usage: kapacitor define-topic-handler <path to handler spec file>
$ kapacitor define-topic-handler ./slack.yaml

Validate the handler was defined as expected:

$ kapacitor show-topic-handler cpu slack

Finally confirm the topic is configured as expected:

$ kapacitor show-topic cpu

The output should look something like:

ID: cpu
Level: OK
Collected: 27
Handlers: [slack]
Events:
Event                            Level    Message                                Date
cpu:cpu=cpu3,host=localhost      OK       cpu:cpu=cpu3,host=localhost is OK      23 Jan 17 14:04 MST

That is it! Future alerts triggered by the cpu_alert task will be sent to Slack via the cpu topic.

Summary

While it is simple to define alert handlers directly in the TICKscript, tracking and maintenance can become burdensome once many tasks have been created. Using topics decouples the definition of the alert from the handling of the alert. With topic and handler bindings defined, to change the slack channel is a single API call to update the slack handler. More importantly, no TICKscripts have to change.

Going further

Chaining topics

Topics can be chained together using the publish action handler. This allows alerts to be further grouped into various topics.

For example the above task could be modified to send alerts to the system topic instead of the cpu topic. This way all system related alerts can be handled in a consistent manner.

The new TICKscript:

stream
    |from()
        .measurement('cpu')
        .groupBy(*)
    |alert()
        .warn(lambda: "usage_idle" < 20)
        .crit(lambda: "usage_idle" < 10)
        // Send alerts to the `system` topic
        .topic('system')

To send all system alerts to a new topic ops_team, create a new handler for the system topic.

topic: system
id: publish-to-ops_team
kind: publish
options:
  topics:
    - ops_team
kapacitor define-topic-handler ./publish-to-ops_team.yaml

Since the operations team has an on-call rotation, handling of alerts on the ops_team topic can be set up accordingly.

topic: ops_team
id: victorops
kind: victorops
options:
  routing-key: ops_team
kapacitor define-topic-handler ./victorops.yaml

Now all system related alerts get sent to the ops_team topic which in turn get handled in Victor Ops.

Match conditions

Match conditions can be applied to handlers. Only alerts matching the conditions will be handled by that handler.

For example it is typical to only send Slack messages when alerts change state instead of every time an alert is evaluated. Modifying the slack handler definition from the first example results in the following:

topic: cpu
id: slack
kind: slack
match: changed() == TRUE
options:
  channel: '#alerts'

Now update the handler and only alerts that changed state will be sent to Slack.

kapacitor define-topic-handler ./slack.yaml

Was this page helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!


The future of Flux

Flux is going into maintenance mode. You can continue using it as you currently are without any changes to your code.

Flux is going into maintenance mode and will not be supported in InfluxDB 3.0. This was a decision based on the broad demand for SQL and the continued growth and adoption of InfluxQL. We are continuing to support Flux for users in 1.x and 2.x so you can continue using it with no changes to your code. If you are interested in transitioning to InfluxDB 3.0 and want to future-proof your code, we suggest using InfluxQL.

For information about the future of Flux, see the following: